Skip to main content
Title:
Sasol Oil (Pty) Ltd and Another v Metcalfe No 2004 (5) SA 161 (W)
Party:
South Africa
Region:
Africa
Type of document:
National - higher court
Date of text:
September 16, 2005
Data source:
InforMEA
Court name:
The Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa
Justice(s):
Cachalia Aja
Reference number:
No. 368/2004
ECOLEX subject(s):
Legal questions
Environment gen.
Agricultural & rural development
Abstract:

‘Protection of the environment ─ Prohibition on undertaking of environmentally detrimental activities without written authorisation of competent authority as intended in s 22 of Environment Conservation Act 73 of 1989 (ECA) ─ Scope of mandate of competent authority; - the words ‘storage’ and ‘handling’ facility for dangerous and hazardous substances are broad enough to include a filling station. - decision taken in terms of policy guidelines not irrational ─ a party seeking to impugn rationality of decision must demonstrate exceptional basis to succeed in review application. - section 36(2) of ECA read in context, together with s 35, does not constitute a time bar to the institution of review proceedings after internal remedies have been exhausted.’

 

(Source: http://www.justice.gov.za/ )